Wednesday, January 14, 2026

Art Deco: 1943 Doxa “Clamshell” on a Henry & Cie Expansion Bracelet

Art Deco: 1943 Doxa “Clamshell” on a Henry & Cie Expansion Bracelet


The 1943 Doxa clamshell is not a watch that demands attention due to its size. Measuring only 22 mm wide, 40 mm lug-to-lug, and 16 mm between the lugs, it may seem modest on paper. However, when worn on the wrist, it feels surprisingly assertive. The case has a purposeful stretch, the dial offers warmth and clarity, and the watch's overall presence belies its small dimensions.


Part of the impression stems from the bracelet: a Henry & Cie expansion band, period-correct and perfectly suited to the watch’s utilitarian character. It introduces a sense of industrial practicality—comfortable, functional, and very much of its time.

The Clamshell Case: Waterproof Innovation of the 1930s

The term "clamshell" refers to a case design that originated in the 1930s, a time when waterproofing was still a challenge rather than a standard feature. In 1936, Schmitz Frères & Cie, a Swiss case maker, filed a patent for this design, which was registered in 1937 and became the basis for this approach.

The clamshell design uses mechanical compression instead of a traditional screw-down back. This typically involves four screws located near the lugs that clamp the case together and create a seal. This was a practical solution for its time—simple, easy to service, and specifically designed to combat a major threat to mechanical watches: moisture.


Gallet notably adopted the design for its waterproof chronographs in the late 1930s, demonstrating that the concept was not merely decorative, but a serious effort towards durability.

Rectangular and tonneau cases fit the dominant design language of the time. Art Deco’s defining look is clean geometry and stylized, streamlined forms—exactly what rectangular watches put on the wrist.

A few “men’s watch” dynamics made the rectangle especially attractive in the 1920s–30s:

• It signaled “modern” wristwatch design vs. pocket-watch legacy.

• It photographed and advertised well. A flat rectangle as an extension of a matching bracelet reads as an object—almost like a cigarette case or tie clip—very on-brand for Deco luxury.


By the 1940's, watch designs increasingly featured round cases as waterproofing and sealing became easier to achieve. With increased precision, round cases (or, more specifically, dials) kept the indices at the same distance from the hands, allowing for more accurate reading of the exact time.

Today, with atomic-level time at our fingertips, wearing a vintage wristwatch is again becoming a design statement. Increasingly, vintage watch enthusiasts are turning to design-based watches, including those with an Art Deco design ethos.

Doxa in Context

Doxa, founded in 1889 in Le Locle, Switzerland, built a reputation for reliable wristwatches by the early 20th century. This clamshell model from 1943 exemplifies this ethos perfectly: it is restrained, robust, and engineered for longevity.

Stainless Steel: The Right Choice

The case is made of stainless steel, a material that became popular in the 1930s and 1940s for everyday watches. Stainless steel is corrosion-resistant, retains its shape, and ages gracefully. In this example, decades of light wear have not diminished its defining features, which include squared shoulders, a sharp bezel, and a solid, purposeful structure.


Henry & Cie was one of the early Swiss manufacturers of expandable metal bracelets, particularly notable from the 1930s to the 1950s. These bracelets were designed for functionality; they expand and contract easily, ensuring comfort for all-day wear without a buckle or clasp. They were often paired with watches intended for practical, everyday use rather than just formal occasions.

The Gilt Dial: Warmth and Depth

The dial is where the watch truly comes to life. It features a classic gilt design with a dark base, gold-toned numerals and tracks, and a small seconds register at the six o'clock position. 


The overall effect is not flashy; instead, it presents a warm and legible aesthetic that is rich in depth, a quality that modern printing often struggles to achieve. The layout is well-organized, making full use of the rectangular format without feeling overcrowded.

Why It Feels Bigger Than It Is

A 22 mm wide watch typically feels small, but the 40 mm lug span extends its reach, and the rectangular case enhances that effect. 


When paired with the Henry & Cie bracelet—broad, flat, and functional. The watch gains visual weight without adding extra thickness. It doesn't feel like a delicate tank; instead, it has the presence of a compact tool—slim yet serious.

A Design That Still Makes Sense

The clamshell era represents a captivating moment in the history of watchmaking. It is early enough that waterproofing was achieved through innovative mechanics, yet it is advanced enough for these solutions to be practical. This Doxa watch exemplifies that period perfectly: it features a steel clamshell case, a gilt dial, a small seconds display, and a bracelet that feels suitable for everyday use even today.

Its understated design is its greatest strength. There are no frills, just a watch built to last.

Specifications

  • Brand: DoxaYear: 1943
  • Case construction: “Clamshell” waterproof-style case (compression design associated with Schmitz Frères patent, 1936/1937)
  • Case material: Stainless steel
  • Case size (width): 22 mm
  • Lug-to-lug: 40 mm
  • Lug width: 16 mm
  • Dial: Black gilt dial with gilt Arabic numerals and gilt railroad-style minute track
  • Seconds: Small seconds subdial at 6 o’clock
  • Hands: Gilt hands
  • Crown: Unsigned (as pictured)
  • Bracelet: Henry & Cie (H&C) expansion bracelet
  • Wrist presence: Compact width with long lug span; wears larger than expected due to rectangular geometry and bracelet integration.

Thursday, September 11, 2025

Rolex Day-Date ref. 1803 — mid-century prestige, modern relevance

 


Rolex Day-Date ref. 1803 — mid-century prestige, modern relevance

Why it matters



Introduced in 1956, the Day-Date was the first wristwatch to show both the date and the day of the week spelled out in full, available only in precious metals and positioned by Rolex as the ultimate symbol of achievement. Reference 1803 is the definitive vintage expression: 36 mm Oyster case, fluted bezel, pie-pan dial, acrylic crystal with Cyclops, and the three-link “President” bracelet.

A short origin story

Rolex’s post-war run of practical innovations set the stage: the waterproof Oyster case (1926), the Perpetual rotor (1931), the Datejust with instantaneous date (1945). The Day-Date extended this logic of everyday utility plus prestige to the language of leadership: a calendar you read at a glance, in your language, inside an elegant gold Oyster. That mix is core Rolex strategy: create a category where functionality and status reinforce each other.

The 1803 at a glance



  • Case: 36 mm Oyster in 18k yellow, white, or rose gold; fluted bezel; screw-down crown; acrylic crystal with Cyclops.

  • Dial: classic “pie-pan” profile; wide range of colors and textures, often with tritium lume. The 1803 is the last Day-Date generation with pie-pan dials. 

  • Bracelet/strap: President three-link bracelet or leather.

  • Calendar: instantaneous date at 3; day arc at 12 with discs offered in 26 languages. 

Inside the case: calibres 1555 and 1556



Early 1803s use the COSC-certified, non-quickset calibre 1555 (18,000 vph). Around 1965 Rolex transitions to 1556 with a higher beat rate of 19,800 vph; hacking seconds is added circa 1972. In 1977–78 the Day-Date family moves to 18038 with the high-beat 3055 and a quick-set date, ending the 1803 era. 

Variants in the 18xx family

Rolex multiplied textures and finishes to broaden appeal without leaving the precious-metal lane. Alongside the 1803’s fluted bezel you’ll see the bark-finished 1807 and the hammered “Morellis/Florentine” 1806—both period options that underline Day-Date’s role as a canvas for luxury craft. 

How marketing shaped perception


From the mid-1960s Rolex leaned into leadership. Period ads used the line “The presidents’ watch,” and President Lyndon B. Johnson’s documented affinity for a yellow-gold Day-Date cemented the association. Since then the model has been coded as the watch of statesmen, executives, and cultural power brokers—status made legible at 12 o’clock. 



Why collectors still care

  • Proportions: 36 mm wears slim and balanced.

  • Dial architecture: pie-pan depth, warm acrylic, and tritium patina read unmistakably vintage. 

  • Movements: 1555/1556 are robust, widely understood by independent watchmakers; later 1556 examples add hacking. 

  • Cultural signal: decades of association with leadership keep the model instantly recognizable. 

Notes to the photos in this post

The pictured 1803 shows the key signatures: fluted bezel, pie-pan dial with day at 12 and date under Cyclops, baton furniture, and the President bracelet’s convex three-link rhythm. Those visual cues are why a well-kept 1803 still reads as “the” Day-Date.

Buying checklist (quick)

  • Confirm calibre (1555 vs 1556; hacking from ~1972).

  • Check dial originality and lume consistency; many 1803s wear linen, matte, or sunburst dials

  • Inspect bracelet stretch; President links fatigue over decades.

  • Verify crisp fluting and correct crown/tube engagement on the Oyster case.

  • Day wheel language matches papers if present; 26 language options exist. 

  • Expect non-quickset setting ritual; if you need quickset, look to 18038+. 


Technical spec recap

  • Reference: 1803

  • Years: ~1959–1978

  • Case: 36 mm Oyster, fluted bezel, acrylic crystal

  • Movements: 1555 (18,000 vph), 1556 (19,800 vph; hacking ~1972)

  • Bracelet: President (three-link) or leather

  • Materials: 18k yellow, white, or rose gold

  • Dial: pie-pan; tritium lume on many variants

  • Calendar: instantaneous date; day at 12; non-quickset

Sources: Rolex history pages; Fratello’s Day-Date overview; WatchBase movement records; period advertising and documented LBJ usage; Bob’s Watches technical guides and dial notes. 

Monday, September 8, 2025

A Vintage Watch Blog Detour: An Omega, an Owl, and Why Objects Carry Meaning

 

A Vintage Watch Blog Detour: An Omega, an Owl, and Why Objects Carry Meaning



This space is usually about vintage watches. Today’s post stays on-theme by anchoring to a clean mid-century Omega Seamaster, but it pivots to a companion object with deeper antiquity: an “Athenian Owl” signet ring modeled on the classical silver tetradrachm. Watches mark time. Signet rings mark identity. Together they show how we carry meaning on the wrist and in the hand.

Athena: the city’s namesake and north star

Athena, goddess of wisdom, strategy, and crafts, was Athens’ patron deity. Origin myths put her in a contest with Poseidon to bestow the greater civic gift; she offered the olive tree, promising food, oil, timber, and trade. 


The polis adopted her name and her ethos: intelligence combined with practical skill and disciplined force. In religion, she was Athena Polias, protector of the city; in statecraft, she was the emblem under which Athenian democracy, law, and artisanry flourished.

The Athenian silver tetradrachm: the “owl” that ruled trade

By the 5th century BCE, Athens struck a high-purity silver tetradrachm that became the Mediterranean’s reserve currency. Its reliability rested on:

  • Silver source: the Laurion mines south of Athens supplied consistent metal in large volume.

  • Standard weight and fabric: ~17.2 g of silver, four drachmas to the coin.

  • Iconic design: instantly recognizable and hard to counterfeit at scale.

Value in wages. A common benchmark puts one drachma near the daily pay of a skilled worker or hoplite. On that basis, a tetradrachm equaled roughly four days’ wages. Conversions varied with wartime premiums and market conditions, but in everyday terms this single coin could buy staples for a household for several days or pay a craftsman for nearly a week.



Role in Mediterranean trade. Tetradrachms or "Owls" traveled. Merchants from Egypt to the Levant to Sicily accepted them without assay, which lowered transaction friction. Athens used owls to buy grain, timber, and shipbuilding materials, and to fund fleets and building programs. When you see an “owl,” you are looking at one of history’s most successful monetary technologies: a trusted, portable standard.

Reading the ring: symbols from a civic identity



This signet condenses the coin’s obverse language:

  • The Owl. The species on the classical coin is the Little owl (Athene noctua), the bird sacred to Athena. It signals sharp vision and alertness, metaphorized as wisdom. On the coin, the owl faces right, often with a frontal eye, giving a “staring” immediacy that made the type unmistakable even in low light.

  • The Olive sprig. A small twig with leaves and fruit appears behind the owl. It recalls Athena’s gift and the Athenian economy’s backbone: food, lamp oil, medicine, wood, and trade revenue. In civic terms it meant prosperity through cultivation, not plunder. In religious terms it meant the goddess’s ongoing guardianship.

  • The letters ΑΘΕ. Classical tetradrachms carry ΑΘΕ, an abbreviation of ΑΘΗΝΑΙΩΝ—“of the Athenians.” It marks the coin as a state issue and a statement: this value is guaranteed by the polis of Athena.

  • The crescent moon. Many tetradrachms include a crescent, likely alluding to the nocturnal owl and the passage of time under the goddess’s watch. Some later traditions linked it to victories fought by moonlight, but numismatists generally treat the crescent as a lunar symbol rather than a specific battle badge. In practice, it completed a triad: bird of night, moon of night, city under divine clarity.

Personal meaning: how the symbols work for me




  • Owl → Wisdom. A reminder to choose clarity over noise, to see in low-signal conditions, and to act with strategy rather than impulse.

  • Olive → Resourcefulness. The olive is my favorite plant because of its deep human partnership: food, oil for light and cooking, wood for heat and shelter. It stands for resourcefulness that sustains households and cities.

  • Crescent → Success. A quiet emblem of hard-won success, not boastful but steady, like phases that return.

  • Silver tetradrachm → Prosperity. A guarantee stamped “of the Athenians,” reminding me that prosperity is collective: trust, standards, and institutions make value travel.

  • Unfinished → Continuity. The signet is unfinished and still carries the silversmith's work marks. It serves as a reminder that the attainment of knowledge, resourcefulness, success, and prosperity is never completed.

If you would like an Athenian Tetradrachm signet ring of your own, check out Athena Owl Coin Signet Ring Oxidized Silver 

Why a vintage Omega belongs in this story

The Omega Seamaster is mid-century modernity distilled: precise, legible, engineered to endure. Like the owl, it is recognizable at a glance and prized for reliability. 

Athens made a monetary standard; Omega pursued a timing standard. Both designs privilege clarity, trust, and utility over ornament. Wearing the watch with the ring pairs two technologies of time and value.

A watch can keep you punctual. A signet can keep you purposeful. Together they tell time and tell you what to do with it.



Molnija 1964: A Soviet Pocket Watch With Swiss DNA

Molnija 1964: A Soviet Pocket Watch With Swiss DNA

Why this watch matters

A 1964 Molnija pocket watch sits at the intersection of Soviet industrial planning, military and railway timekeeping, and pre-war Swiss movement design. It is robust, legible, and serviceable, with a movement lineage that traces back to Cortebert calibers used by early Rolex pocket and military watches.

The Molnija factory: origins and mandate

Molnija (Молния, “Lightning”) was established in 1947 in Chelyabinsk, east of the Urals. The post-war brief was simple: build reliable timekeepers for state needs. Priority customers included the Ministry of Defense, civil aviation, the railways, and the merchant navy. Output focused on large, easily read pocket watches and dashboard clocks rather than fashion-driven wristwatches. The factory standardized designs, consolidated suppliers, and trained a workforce to assemble, regulate, and overhaul movements at scale. The result was a rugged product engineered for harsh conditions and straightforward maintenance.

Pocket watches in the Soviet Union

For two decades after World War II, pocket watches remained common across the USSR. Wristwatches were not yet universally available and were often more expensive relative to wages. Pocket watches served:

  • Field officers, artillery crews, and radio operators who needed a protected time source away from shock and debris.

  • Railway staff and stationmasters who relied on large dials and sub-seconds for precision and synchronization.

  • Industrial workers and engineers operating in environments where a wristwatch could snag, contaminate, or be damaged.

  • Navigators and mechanics in aviation and shipping who preferred pocket formats for on-board reference or panel mounting.

Even as wristwatches spread in the 1960s, the state continued ordering pocket watches for institutional use where legibility and robustness trumped fashion.

The movement: Swiss roots and the Rolex connection

Inside this 1964 example is the Molnija caliber 3602, a 16-size, 15-jewel, hand-wound movement running at a relaxed beat (commonly 18,000 vph). Its architecture is a close derivative of the pre-war Cortebert 616/620 family. Cortebert supplied ebauches not only under its own name but also to other brands; Rolex used Cortebert-based pocket and deck-watch movements for select references and for military-adjacent projects. That is the lineage Molnija adopted: a reliable, big-plate design with ample torque, wide tolerances, and simple keyless works. In practice this means:

  • Large, separate bridges for the gear train.

  • A generous balance with flat hairspring and curb pins.

  • A straightforward, easily serviced barrel and ratchet arrangement.

  • Sub-seconds at 6 via a true small-seconds fourth wheel.


Factory marks. The bridge stamp “ЧЧЗ” confirms Chelyabinsk Watch Factory. “15 КАМНЕЙ” = 15 jewels. The two-part date “2-64” is a quarter code: Q2 1964. The “443” is an internal assembly/inspector or workshop code used for batch control.



Caliber. Molnija 3602 architecture. 16-size, hand-wound, small seconds at 6. Separate train bridge, large ratchet and crown wheels, straight-grained nickel plates, polished screw heads. Beat rate ~18,000 vph. No shock protection on the balance (typical of 3602), which fits the pre-mid-60s.

Why the early build matters. This Q2-1964 piece sits at the tail end of the higher-finish era. Bridges show cleaner edge breaks, even nickel plating, and consistent jewel setting. Later mid-60s examples more often show simplified finishing and wider cosmetic tolerances.

Production date on the movement. As noted, Molnija stamped dates on the bridge. On this piece, “2-64” is plainly visible, which is how collectors authenticate period.

Case, dial, hands

  • Case: Silveroid (steel, nickel, zinc alloy) with a snap back and a sturdy pendant-crown. Inexpensive and strong, Silveroid d is an ideal material for watches as it is corrosion resistant, making it an excellent choice for daily wear. Diameter around ~50–52 mm. The case is functional rather than delicate, with thick walls and a tall crystal to clear the long hands.


  • Dial: High-contrast Arabic numerals, a crisp railroad minute track, and a recessed sub-seconds at 6, built for legibility in low light.



  • Hands: Heat-blued spade or leaf hands are common. True thermal bluing shows color shift under different angles and a deep, in-material blue rather than paint.




  • Movement finish: Nickel-plated plates with brushed bridges, polished screw heads, and clear, unfussy machining. Early examples often show crisper edges and cleaner surface prep.

Quality before and after 1964

Early Molnija 3602 production emphasized consistency and finish. Jeweling, plating thickness, and regulation targets were tight for the period. After 1964, several changes crept in as the factory scaled and modernized:

  • Simplified finishing on bridges and screws.

  • More variability in plating quality and edge definition.

  • Progressive cost controls that affected cosmetic details more than core function.

  • Introduction and parallel use of shock-protected variants (often labeled 3603) with different parts interchangeability.
    Performance remained solid for institutional needs, but collectors often find pre-mid-1960s pieces better finished on average.

Who carried them

  • Military: Officers, artillery timekeepers, signals units, and armor crews who needed a stowable time source away from shock.


  • Railways: Conductors, dispatchers, and stationmasters who synchronized timetables and flags.

  • Industry: Supervisors and machinists in plants where a wristwatch could be fouled by coolant, oils, or protective clothing.

  • Medical and scientific staff: Nurses and lab technicians, timing procedures with a clean, pocketable instrument.

Living with a Molnija today

A 1964 Molnija is straightforward to service. Parts availability remains good because of long production runs and movement simplicity. When buying or overhauling:

  • Verify the movement date stamp and matching case period details.

  • Check endshake and side-shake on the train; these watches tolerate use but reward careful adjustment.

  • Inspect the blued hands for repainting; true heat bluing is distinct.

  • Expect ±30–60 s/day without heroic regulation; better is possible with careful work.

Bottom line

This 1964 Molnija is a working piece of Soviet industrial history with Swiss movement DNA. It was built to keep railways running, troops coordinated, and factories on schedule. It remains honest, durable, and collectible—especially in earlier, better-finished trims.



Friday, August 29, 2025

A 1961 Omega Seamaster 14704 SC-61 Cal. 591 on a Bonklip Bracelet


The Watch: Omega Seamaster 14704 SC-61 (1961)

This reference 14704 SC-61 houses the caliber 591 automatic movement, part of Omega’s evolution into mid-century, thin-profile automatic watches. With 20 jewels, a bidirectional winding rotor, and a smooth sweep, the 591 represents the refinement of Omega’s pre-COSC movements before the later chronometer-grade calibers dominated the lineup.


The dial is particularly striking: an “Explorer” style 3-6-9 layout, reminiscent of tool watches of the era but paired here with the elegant Seamaster script. The patinated lume plots at the numerals and dagger indices reflect natural aging, a prized trait for collectors today.





The case, stamped 14704 SC-61, is stainless steel with a screw-down Seahorse caseback, engraved with the emblem that became synonymous with the Seamaster line. The crown carries the correct Ω logo, and the overall design balances utility with understated mid-century elegance.


From the Dirty Dozen to the Seamaster

Omega’s connection to military tool watches runs deep. During World War II, Omega supplied thousands of wristwatches to the British Ministry of Defence, including their contribution to the famed “Dirty Dozen” issued to the Allied forces. Those watches were simple, durable, and resistant to the harsh conditions of war.

Post-war, Omega leveraged this military expertise when launching the Seamaster line in 1948, designed as a civilian waterproof watch with military DNA. The early Seamasters borrowed from the hermetically sealed cases and durable construction developed during wartime. The 14704 carries this lineage forward—rugged enough for daily wear, yet elegant enough for post-war prosperity.


The Bonklip Bracelet: WW2 Innovation, Postwar Utility

The Bonklip bracelet, first patented in the 1920s and popularized through the 1930s–40s, was widely used by RAF pilots and military personnel during World War II. Its stainless steel ladder-link design offered several advantages:

  • Lightweight and breathable in hot, humid climates.

  • Instant adjustability, allowing the bracelet to be worn over uniforms.

  • Corrosion resistance, crucial in tropical deployments.

For these reasons, Bonklip bracelets became synonymous with military-issued tool watches.



Pairing a 1961 Seamaster with a Bonklip bracelet is period-correct and historically meaningful. While leather straps often degraded in tropical service, Bonklip bracelets endured. Collectors today appreciate the practical elegance of this combination, which ties directly back to Omega’s wartime legacy.


Technical Specifications

  • Reference: Omega Seamaster 14704 SC-61

  • Year: 1961

  • Movement: Omega Cal. 591, automatic, 20 jewels

  • Case: Stainless steel, screw-down Seahorse caseback

  • Dial: Explorer-style 3-6-9 dial with applied indices, luminous plots

  • Crystal: Acrylic (hesalite)

  • Bracelet: Bonklip stainless steel


A Watch of Continuity

This Seamaster tells a story: from Omega’s wartime production of robust tool watches, through the civilian boom of the Seamaster line, to the enduring practicality of the Bonklip bracelet. It is a piece where history, engineering, and aesthetics converge—a mid-century timepiece that remains as practical today as it was over sixty years ago.

Images above: The crisp white dial with Explorer numerals, the copper-toned cal. 591 movement, the Seahorse caseback, and the period-correct Bonklip bracelet advertisement and patent drawing.






Sunday, June 18, 2023

1955 Helvetia reference 351 (caliber 64 manual winding, sub-second movement)

Helvetia Watches: A Legacy of Swiss Craftsmanship

Helvetia Watches, renowned for their precision and elegance, has a storied history that intertwines with the iconic Swiss watch brand, Omega. Helvetia, the Latin name for Switzerland, perfectly represents the brand's commitment to Swiss horological tradition and craftsmanship.

In April 1892, Louis Brandt & Frere, a prominent Swiss watch company, registered the name 'Helvetia' as one of their brand names. During this period, they also introduced the name 'Omega' for a new line of high-quality lever movement pocket watches, showcasing their pioneering manufacturing techniques.

The success of Omega watches led the Brandt brothers to establish a new company in La Chaux de-Fonds called 'Société d'Horlogerie La Générale' in 1895. This move allowed them to allocate more resources to the production of Omega watches by transferring the manufacturing of their other watches to this subsidiary.

However, in 1911, Omega Watch Co decided to withdraw from La Générale, resulting in the official transfer of the registered brand names that were still under Omega's control.

During the 1950s to 1960s, Helvetia flourished in the era of dress watches, characterized by slim profiles and sophisticated aesthetics. The brand's dress watches from this period showcased exquisite craftsmanship and attention to detail - this example being no exception



Notably, Helvetia introduced the reference 64 movements, which were renowned for their precision and durability. Introduced during the 1950s, this hand-wound sub-second movement was renowned for its exceptional accuracy and reliability. The movement shows many similarities to contemporary Omega movements.

The caliber 64 movement emerged shortly after the introduction of the 830 family and showcased Helvetia's adaptability to the changing trends of the time. A larger 13.5 Ligne size reflected the growing preference for larger watches, while the caliber 64 movement was thinner than its predecessor, the 82C, making it ideal for slim dress watches of the era. With a frequency of 18,000 vibrations per hour, it provided precise timekeeping and powered numerous Helvetia timepieces.

This piece has a serial number on the inside back cover dating it to 1955:


I found this piece in a second-hand shop in Århus, and was drawn by its wonderfully patinaed dial, rose gold hands and markers and large sub-second dial. It's 35 mm was large for the time, and the narrow bezel makes it wear larger - it would certainly have stood out in the post-war years!

The movement is pristine, starts up with a few winds of the crown and is still accurate to within seconds a day - internal markings indicate that this watch was serviced and maintained. Fitted to an olive drab NATO strap this watch becomes informal, with the rose gold hands and markers highlighted by the contrasting olive green of the strap, but can quickly be transformed to a formal dress watch by fitting a dark brown Horween leather strap.




Tuesday, September 28, 2021

Rolex 1603 Sigma Linen dial - so... when is a dial rare?



I recently liquidized a fair portion of my vintage Seiko watch collection to acquire my first steel vintage Rolex - 1967 Rolex reference 1603 Sigma Linen dial. I chose it specifically for the "rare" combination of 1603-specific stainless steel machined bezel (most DateJusts have the white gold fluted bezel; reference 1601), pie-pan textile-like "linen" dial (most DateJusts do not have textured dials), and white gold "Sigma" indices and hands (most DateJusts have steel indices and hands). I like the utilitarian look and resilience of an all-steel DateJust (especially on an Oyster bracelet with the discretion (and corrosion resistance) of white gold hands and indices:

During my pre-acquisition search phase, I saw a Chrono24 ad calling a linen dial a "rare piece" and speculated what the definition of "rare piece" is. After some thought, I defined "rare" as:

A watch I can expect to see "once-or-less-in-a-lifetime" by chance 


...and had a basis to determine whether the combination 1603+Sigma+Linen is rare - or not.

I started with the date range of 160X four-digit Datejusts (1960 to 1979) and the serial numbers starting and ending this range (0,5M to 5.7M) for all references which gave 5M pieces produced, assumed (optimistically) 40% of all Rolexes made in this period were DateJusts (2M 16XX) produced of which half (1M) remain. I then checked Chrono24 to see the distribution of the various 160X references and dial types: 30% were 1603s, 4% 1603 Sigma, 3% 1603 Linen and 0.4% were 1603 Sigma + Linen dials. 


So - are the 4.000 remaining 1603 Sigma+Linen dials "rare" (by my definition)? 

Well, assuming 8B people globally and 4000 1603 Sigma+Linen dials, my calculation suggests there will be 2 million people for every 1603 Sigma+Linen (or 3 in Denmark -pop.6M - where I live). I asked Google how many people faces (or in this context - watch faces :-) I will see in a lifetime (ie. be within eye-identification-of-the-watch-on-their-wrist distance) and the estimate was 1,5M people. And with that, we have the number of 1603s I can expect to see in a lifetime as:

(1603: 56; 1603 Sigma: 8; 1603 Linen: 6 and 1603 Sigma+Linen: 0.75)

From this, I deduce that there might be 3 or so 1603 Sigma+Linen dials in Denmark (population about 6 million) but I'll be lucky to see one in a chance encounter in my lifetime..


Of course, I'll now probably see a 1603 Sigma+Linen dial in the queue in Aldi tomorrow, and another next Thursday... I'll keep you posted!